| |
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:11 am Post subject: the use of umpires-cricket |
|
|
|
hi friends, i just wanted to know the use of umpires in cricket,present day cricket. i feel that umpires are not needed because umpires can turn the tide around in a match. when the umpire gives a decision,it may be wrong and that wrong decision can turn the whole story. the match becomes totally unfair. supposing during the world cup finals or during any trophy matches,if an umpire declares a person out when he is not out,then it makes a big difference,it changes the result of the match. the umpires have been making mistakes constantly and that affects the whole game and its popularity. why arent the board members looking into the problem,especially when there is the third umpire which is computerised and gives the right decision. when the right decision is not given,how can players the game in the right spirit,they lose their chance to prove themselves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
hello friends, i really wonder why noone is replying. isnt it an interesting topic. i look forward to get your views about it i am very eager to get your replies,and then we can further talk about it. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hey, Arun, don't double-post. You could be banned for it.
As for your question, I feel its totally justified. Umpires are not really needed in cricket, except for providing employment.
Technology has developed so much that we can have a computer examine the replays to judge whether a person is out or not out.
Or, there could be only a third umpire, who could be referred to as the umpire.
LBW and run-out decisions and a decision on any other controversial thing could be made by him.
There's really no need for an on-field umpire. So, I agree with you.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrew247 Feel the Power


Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Location: c:\GoogleCommunity 88888.75 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
There still needs to be an element of human input.
If anything, the umpires cause a talking point.
Once you start taking the umpire out of things, things become less enjoyable.
For example, say someone kicks the stump.
How will the computer know it was a player and not a ball? _________________ Football Rumours | Gloog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
hello there andrew, nothing is going to happen if someone kicks the stumps or something. the third umpire can easily find it out because there are cameras located everywhere!!!!!!!!! cameras are even located in the stumps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and thats good but the thing is that one wrong decision spoils a bright cricketers whole career and thats too bad and worst of all the umpires go on giving wrong decisions. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrew247 Feel the Power


Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Location: c:\GoogleCommunity 88888.75 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | the third umpire can easily find it out |
Is the third umpire a computer? _________________ Football Rumours | Gloog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
hi andrew, well the third umpire is a computer and that is why i especially said that the umpire will find it out,i mean the third umpire. if you see a cricket match you will find that there are hundreds of cameras located in different places. so i suppose that it supports my statement that we dont need umpires in cricket because, when there is technology why do we have to spoil a persons life and decrease the popularity of such a great sport. so friends,i say that TECHNOLOGY ROCKS!!!!! _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrew247 Feel the Power


Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Location: c:\GoogleCommunity 88888.75 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
But the computer can't tell that someone kicked the stumps, or a player, or murdered someone on the field. _________________ Football Rumours | Gloog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
well andrew, the third umpire,that is the computer knows everything. the latest technology offers everything. if you have seen cricket matches,there are cameras situated everywhere,absolutely everywhere so its clearly visible and anyway a player wouldnt murder another player,it will spoil his whole career. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hmm... I don't know whether you understood Andrew or not, Arun, but what he says is something worth mentioning.
Technology hasn't evolved to such a level that a computer can differentiate between a ball and a leg, really.
That's precisely why I also mentioned in my earlier post here that there could be a third umpire (a real human, that is).
But there's no doubt about the fact that the on-field umpires aren't of much use. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
well iamtheking9, what do you mean? obviously a computer can differentiate between a leg and a ball,it is understood, it is also easily visible to the naked eye. then what do you mean by your statement?if you watch a match properly you will definitely understand. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
You don't understand, Arun. A computer cannot differentiate between the two scenarios Andrew told you about. It simply isn't possible.
You can, obviously, understand the difference, but a computer can't. Just cameras won't do. So, Arun, you need a human third-umpire.
But on-field umpires are of no use. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
well iamtheking9, why dont you understand what i am saying. obviously a decision is taken by a human,how can a computer make a decision after the umpire looks at the thing from different angles or whatever it is,he gives his decision,its obvious. you arent getting my point. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| arun.v wrote: | | well the third umpire is a computer |
You seem to have forgotten what you yourself wrote. You said that, according to you, the third umpire should be a computer.
And now you say that its got to be a human. You're contradicting yourself, Arun. Just agree with my point of view, will you?  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Posted: 6 Oct 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|