Google Community Chat
 
the use of umpires-cricket
Goto page 1, 2  Next
You're visiting Google Community as a guest.
In order to post, you'll need to register and log in.

(If you were registered and logged in, these advertisements wouldn't be here)
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // Sports Forum
   
Author Message
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:11 am    Post subject: the use of umpires-cricket Reply with quote
hi friends,
 
         i just wanted to know the use of umpires in cricket,present day cricket.
i feel that umpires are not needed because umpires can turn the tide around in a match.
when the umpire gives a decision,it may be wrong and that wrong decision can turn the whole story.
the match becomes totally unfair.
supposing during the world cup finals or during any trophy matches,if an umpire declares a person out when he is not out,then it makes a big difference,it changes the result of the match.
the umpires have  been making mistakes constantly and that affects the whole game and its popularity.
why arent the board members looking into the problem,especially when there is the third umpire which is computerised and gives the right decision.
when the right decision is not given,how can players the game in the right spirit,they lose their chance to prove themselves.
 
 
 
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
hello friends,
 
            i really wonder why noone is replying.
isnt it an interesting topic.
i look forward to get your views about it
i am very eager to get your replies,and then we can further talk about it.
 
 
 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
IamTheKing9
Google God
Google Guru


Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
76977.45 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Hey, Arun, don't double-post. You could be banned for it.
As for your question, I feel its totally justified. Umpires are not really needed in cricket, except for providing employment. Wink
Technology has developed so much that we can have a computer examine the replays to judge whether a person is out or not out.
Or, there could be only a third umpire, who could be referred to as the umpire.
LBW and run-out decisions and a decision on any other controversial thing could be made by him.
There's really no need for an on-field umpire. So, I agree with you. Smile
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Google Talk
andrew247
Feel the Power
Google Guru


Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Location: c:\GoogleCommunity
88888.75 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
There still needs to be an element of human input.
If anything, the umpires cause a talking point.
Once you start taking the umpire out of things, things become less enjoyable.

For example, say someone kicks the stump.
How will the computer know it was a player and not a ball?
_________________
Football Rumours | Gloog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 5:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
hello there andrew,
 
nothing is going to happen if someone kicks the stumps or something.
the third umpire can easily find it out because there are cameras located everywhere!!!!!!!!!
cameras are even located in the stumps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and thats good but the thing is that
one wrong decision spoils a bright cricketers whole career and thats too bad
and worst of all the umpires go on giving wrong decisions.
 
 
 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
andrew247
Feel the Power
Google Guru


Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Location: c:\GoogleCommunity
88888.75 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
the third umpire can easily find it out

Is the third umpire a computer?
_________________
Football Rumours | Gloog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
hi andrew,
 
well the third umpire is a computer
and that is why i especially said that the umpire will find it out,i mean the third umpire.
if you see a cricket match you will find that there are hundreds of cameras located in different places.
so i suppose that it supports my statement that we dont need umpires in cricket because,
when there is technology why do we have to spoil a persons life and decrease the popularity of such a great sport.
so friends,i say that TECHNOLOGY ROCKS!!!!!
 
 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
andrew247
Feel the Power
Google Guru


Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Location: c:\GoogleCommunity
88888.75 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
But the computer can't tell that someone kicked the stumps, or a player, or murdered someone on the field.
_________________
Football Rumours | Gloog
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 4:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
well andrew,
 
the third umpire,that is the computer knows everything.
the latest technology offers everything.
if you have seen cricket matches,there are cameras situated everywhere,absolutely everywhere
so its clearly visible and anyway a player wouldnt murder another player,it will spoil his whole career.
 
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
IamTheKing9
Google God
Google Guru


Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
76977.45 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Hmm... I don't know whether you understood Andrew or not, Arun, but what he says is something worth mentioning.
Technology hasn't evolved to such a level that a computer can differentiate between a ball and a leg, really.
That's precisely why I also mentioned in my earlier post here that there could be a third umpire (a real human, that is).
But there's no doubt about the fact that the on-field umpires aren't of much use.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
 
well iamtheking9,
what do you mean?
obviously a computer can differentiate between a leg and a ball,it is understood,
it is also easily visible to the naked eye.
then what do you mean by your statement?if you watch a match properly you will definitely understand.
 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
IamTheKing9
Google God
Google Guru


Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
76977.45 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
You don't understand, Arun. A computer cannot differentiate between the two scenarios Andrew told you about. It simply isn't possible.
You can, obviously, understand the difference, but a computer can't. Just cameras won't do. So, Arun, you need a human third-umpire.
But on-field umpires are of no use.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
well iamtheking9,
why dont you understand what i am saying.
obviously a decision is taken by a human,how can a computer make a decision
after the umpire looks at the thing from different angles or whatever it is,he gives his decision,its obvious.
you arent getting my point.
 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
IamTheKing9
Google God
Google Guru


Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
76977.45 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
arun.v wrote:
well the third umpire is a computer

You seem to have forgotten what you yourself wrote. You said that, according to you, the third umpire should be a computer.
And now you say that its got to be a human. You're contradicting yourself, Arun. Just agree with my point of view, will you? Twisted Evil
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger Google Talk
arun.v
Google Freak
Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Location: Mumbai,India
44267.66 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
well iamtheking9,
you cant be so silly as not to know that a third umpire decision is taken by a human after viewing the replay through all possible angles and it becomes absolutley clear,i hope you know that,please dont tell me that you didnt know that,the computer is not any human to take a decision,its of course the human after the best viewing,we have to talk about onfield umpires being useless. 

_________________
arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger Google Talk
Sponsored Links
Posted: 6 Oct 2008 11:13 pm    Post subject: Advertisements
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // Sports Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Host your free forums with Invision Plus.net forum web hosting with your own subdomain.

alexisBlue v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Icons in Part By: Travis Carden

© 2005-2006 Google Community

Powered by phpBB

Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Powered by Google Search blog

This website is not affiliated in any way with Google, Inc.
Google™ is a registered trademark of Google, Inc.