| |
| Is the ban on shoaib and asif a good decision? |
| yes |
|
100% |
[ 3 ] |
| no |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 3 |
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:53 am Post subject: the banning of mohammad asif and shoaib akhthar |
|
|
|
hi friends, well i just wanted to know whether how many of you think that the ban of shoaib akhthar and mohammad asif was a right decision to be taken or not. well in my opinion,i would rather say that the two year ban on shoaib akhthar is too bad and especially unfair, that thing is going to spoil his career,i mean he was a great bowler and a great asset for pakistan with his fiery pace bowling,i mean noone has ever bowled as fast as him,whatever it is the 2 year ban was absolutely unfair in my opinion. and then the ban on mohammad asif,i suppose he sort of deserves it because as fas i know he took the banned drug nandralone on purpose to enhance his perfomance and thats too bad. well,i would love to get in your views and discuss more about this. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
andrew247 Feel the Power


Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Location: c:\GoogleCommunity 88888.75 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I have no clue who they are, but I'm sure the cricket council (or whoever the official cricket body is), had good reasons for banning them. _________________ Football Rumours | Gloog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, in my opinion, the ban was absolutely fair. Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif got what they deserved.
The International Cricket Council's laws says that a person testing positive for banned substances should be given a one-year ban at least.
If the two people in question did test positive, they obviously had to be banned.
Asif's career isn't going to be affected much, because he's still young. However, he was lucky to get only a one-year ban.
But I suppose Akhtar might not make it back, given his age.
All the same, Mohammad Asif and Shoaib Akhtar got what they deserved. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satyajit Senior Googler


Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: Bombay, India 9312.00 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I partially agree wid Anirban [Iamtheking9] that it is fair............... Asif deserved it i feel. and should get 1 yr ban but with an interview with Shohaib in NDTV he confidently told that he had never broken rules of Cricket. Moreover he said that he had never taken drugs in his life and if the test was positive then there has 2 be sum mistake coz he never took drugs intentionally. He also crtisized the PCB [Pakistan Cricket Board] that they said said there was a doctor on the tour [accordin 2 him there was no doctor] About the rumours that he had slapped Bob Woolmer, Pakistan's coach, were also false he said. _________________ -
Satty 8
[Satyajit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well, I hardly suppose that Akhtar can be believed. Dope test results can hardly be faked.
Plus, Asif also said that he hadn't taken any drugs. So how come you're not saying anything for him?
This is all a result of the respect (be it false or not) Akhtar has gained in his fans.
Nevertheless, one or two rumours of his alleged "badness" always seem to be doing the rounds.
The only way this dispute can be solved is to have a third-party or the ICC examine the test results.
Akhtar's alleged slapping of Bob Woolmer and his saying that his team didn't have a doctor are totally different issues.
Let's not mix them up.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satyajit Senior Googler


Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: Bombay, India 9312.00 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
U never know who is tellin lies n who is true!! and it is a fact that 70%dope tests r fake!!!!! and i was just tellin abt the case odf BOB Woolmer coz Akhtar told abt it!! _________________ -
Satty 8
[Satyajit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Satyajit wrote: | | and i was just tellin abt the case odf BOB Woolmer coz Akhtar told abt it!!<IMG src="http://www.googlecommunity.com/richedit/smileys/8.gif" border=0> |
Well, that dispute can't be solved unless Bob Woolmer says something about it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satyajit Senior Googler


Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: Bombay, India 9312.00 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
well i didnt get u!!! btw...............just 4get it _________________ -
Satty 8
[Satyajit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I meant that unless Bob Woolmer says whether the incident really took place or not, this dispute will keep raging.
After all, we've only heard Akhtar's version of the events. If Bob Woolmer says that Akhtar didn't really slap him, then its all right.
If he says that Akhtar did really slap him, it'll be too bad for Akhtar. But you're right, let's forget this and stick to the actual topic. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satyajit Senior Googler


Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: Bombay, India 9312.00 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
No, it was bob woolmer who accused akhtar of slappin him!!! he was the 1 to start all this!! _________________ -
Satty 8
[Satyajit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arun.v Google Freak


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai,India 44267.66 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
well satya, as iamtheking9 said please stick to the topic. _________________ arun vishwanath
se onr sverdar sitja hvass
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Satyajit Senior Googler


Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Location: Bombay, India 9312.00 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
i am stickin to the topic i was just clearing Anirban's doubt!! _________________ -
Satty 8
[Satyajit] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sorry, Arun, just one more off-topic post. It was not, indeed, Bob Woolmer who said all this. It was reported by a member of their team (though not one of the actual players) to the media. At least, that's what the newspapers said. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hudathekool Googler


Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Location: India 2382.55 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
In my point of view,I think it's a good decision.No player should be left who takes drugs and Asif is not a kid.He knows what he is taking.And the great Aktar,he should be given a longer ban.Asif punishment should be reduced but Shoaib not possible. _________________ Huda the Kool |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9 Google God


Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Location: Mumbai, India 76977.45 GC$
Items
|
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
At last someone totally agrees with me. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Posted: 29 Aug 2008 5:29 pm Post subject: Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|