Stuff2do banned again?

[FeelGood]

Elliot, this is not a good sign. You have banned Stuff2do yet again, and I have not seen him do anything wrong. I also do not like that you refuse to issue warnings before banning people. The only thing that could remotely regarded from one point of view as negative, but barely offensive or harsh is that he posted that you don't care about the forums and such. There is no point in getting into detail, but he was merely expressing his opinion, not flaming anybody. Banning him for that is plain hypocrisy. While I do not really care about the extent of truth in his posts, there was nothing even mildly offensive in them. If you can't take criticism like that, regardless of the nature of their credibility, I sincerely feel disappointed. What happened to freedom of speech?
Hmph.
Back-talking me with "speak for yourself" is not going to be a liable way to escape from this matter.
A public denouncement of his posts would rather have been more appropriate than banishing him from this forum yet again.
If you really had to, you could've just edited in your own comments with a disclaimer to his posts like you did for mine not too long ago.

[Laurent Van Winckel]

Originally Posted by FeelGood

Elliot, this is not a good sign. You have banned Stuff2do yet again, and I have not seen him do anything wrong. I also do not like that you refuse to issue warnings before banning people. The only thing that could remotely regarded from one point of view as negative, but barely offensive or harsh is that he posted that you don't care about the forums and such. There is no point in getting into detail, but he was merely expressing his opinion, not flaming anybody. Banning him for that is plain hypocrisy. While I do not really care about the extent of truth in his posts, there was nothing even mildly offensive in them. If you can't take criticism like that, regardless of the nature of their credibility, I sincerely feel disappointed. What happened to freedom of speech?
Hmph.
Back-talking me with "speak for yourself" is not going to be a liable way to escape from this matter.
A public denouncement of his posts would rather have been more appropriate than banishing him from this forum yet again.
If you really had to, you could've just edited in your own comments with a disclaimer to his posts like you did for mine not too long ago.

Lol banned again, after one day?? What did he do wrong?

[FeelGood]

I don't know, but Tokkolo is saying that she and Randy deleted some spam he supposedly posted. But I want it to be known that I don't trust the moderators.
I wish to see evidence of his spam before I am expected to believe in what has been told to me.

[FeelGood]

ROFLMAO....
Two soviet rofflecopters just dropped a salvo of lol rockets into my home.

[Laurent Van Winckel]

Originally Posted by inteliot

he was expressing his opinion and if you would read the rules it says free speech is not allowed

wtf, sorry, but you're going too far Elliot =S I'm a bit shocked there. What's wrong?!

[FeelGood]

I would appreciate if people would stop spamming my thread as I want a straight and direct response from Elliot. If you have any constructive thoughts to add, feel free to do so. By posting over and over, you are just giving me an opportunity to earn teh +1.

[lizardrocks]

whys a great person like stuff2do banned

[intelliot]

Stuff2do posted lies and spam. Other members agreed that he should be banned, and not just the moderators - although they did too. I saw the spam personally, so I'm not just working off someone else's word.

There are no second chances. That's all I have to say about that.

[lizardrocks]

im going to get multiple account, and loads of email addresses, and then ill be active again on here, eric, ill race you to 100 posts lol