What do u think about stuffing keywords in title tag? - Page 3

tenzin · 07-16-2007, 03:04 AM

thank u so much for the information. after i showed this reply of urs to my friend, he said its a kind of milestone i have made, i mean regarding the topic. we were really confused. but then, isnt it true that many sites use php sitemap instead of xml? so, if search engines donot support the format, it means they will not follow the sitemap(in php) too. right?

tenzin · 07-16-2007, 03:14 AM

and yeah, if we create an xml sitemap, then obviously its not user friendly. so, how can i make it user friendly? using xsl? thou then i need to turn my copies to do those xsl stuffs. or is there things like php file outputting valid xml(i got this info from another forum)? and does it work in that way?

alex-party · 07-16-2007, 09:22 AM

"isnt it true that many sites use php sitemap instead of xml? so, if search engines donot support the format, it means they will not follow the sitemap(in php) too. right?"

There are 2 types of sitemaps.
1 - is what you show to your visitors (html or php).
2 - is what you show to sers (always xml).
You are trying to combine both into one as I understand in a very strange way.

There is a simple way, create:
1. a php XML parser that would read nr.2 xml file and convert it into user friendly look (html) or use xslt if you want.
2. keep xml for sers always in xml.

I can not see another way around for your idea.

tenzin · 07-17-2007, 04:17 AM

thank you alex!

sheena · 07-17-2007, 07:26 AM

stuffing keywords in title tag is an unethical way of SEO technique.

tenzin · 07-17-2007, 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sheena

stuffing keywords in title tag is an unethical way of SEO technique.

thanks sheena for reminding me about the "unethical" stuff. but the problem with seo job is that the clients donot understand this. all they want is good ranking and that too quick...by hook or crook..huh!!!!

tenzin · 07-17-2007, 10:24 PM

what do u prefer using in links? absolute or relative links(../../)? by using relative links, i got a lot of page not found(404) errors. actually i was not the content manager. may be if properly organised, this error wouldnt come. but since there was lot of such. i as a staff at seo, had to convert all those links to absolute one. so will it have a problem later? except that if a folder name is changed, every links should be modified? also, i cant seem to start a new topic here...i mean new thread

tenzin · 07-17-2007, 11:15 PM

how come ur image with 8kb supported by this forum? mine with slightly more than 2 kb was not supported.

tenzin · 07-18-2007, 01:02 AM

hi everyone,
we have a site, which we recently updated. so, there is a vast change within the site regarding links and content. i then submitted the url and verified in google. then, i found out lot of errors

age not found(404). so, i guess its because the google is trying to find the old pages. am i right? so how can i make google understand

that everything has changed and dont search for older files? or how long will it take for everything to come to normal? cos of this reason, when i search for pages in google search engine, they are not shown at all

alex-party · 07-18-2007, 02:06 AM

Relative links can make Search Bots go into INFINITE LOOP.
I created a search bot simulator and tried it on relative links, so basically what I got is something like this:
homepage/index/../../../../../.................... and script died after that

You can't start a thread? Strange, maybe ask admins what the heck....
Also, ask about logo, I have no idea, I'm not a mod here

Luck

07-17-2007, 04:17 AM	#24 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	thank you alex! thank you alex!

07-17-2007, 10:24 PM	#27 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	good morning alex!! its morning over here what do u prefer using in links? absolute or relative links(../../)? by using relative links, i got a lot of page not found(404) errors. actually i was not the content manager. may be if properly organised, this error wouldnt come. but since there was lot of such. i as a staff at seo, had to convert all those links to absolute one. so will it have a problem later? except that if a folder name is changed, every links should be modified? also, i cant seem to start a new topic here...i mean new thread

07-18-2007, 01:02 AM	#29 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	hoping to get help from alex..else no one bothers hi everyone, we have a site, which we recently updated. so, there is a vast change within the site regarding links and content. i then submitted the url and verified in google. then, i found out lot of errorsage not found(404). so, i guess its because the google is trying to find the old pages. am i right? so how can i make google understand that everything has changed and dont search for older files? or how long will it take for everything to come to normal? cos of this reason, when i search for pages in google search engine, they are not shown at all

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Similarity in Meta Name Keywords/Description and Title descriptions on each page.	AmpliMUpton	Search Engine Optimization Forum	4	07-10-2007 02:23 AM
Has Google Given Up On Fighting Keyword stuffing ?	auctions	All About Google	2	11-20-2006 04:55 AM
short title or long title? which is good for SEO?	crush123	Search Engine Optimization Forum	3	10-02-2006 09:31 AM
Google Caught Cloaking - Keyword Stuffing Titles	geekerati	All About Google	0	03-10-2005 04:16 AM
Title?	Pixel	Chit Chat	4	01-19-2005 09:29 AM

07-16-2007, 03:04 AM	#21 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	thank u so much for the information. after i showed this reply of urs to my friend, he said its a kind of milestone i have made, i mean regarding the topic. we were really confused. but then, isnt it true that many sites use php sitemap instead of xml? so, if search engines donot support the format, it means they will not follow the sitemap(in php) too. right?

07-16-2007, 03:14 AM	#22 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	and yeah, if we create an xml sitemap, then obviously its not user friendly. so, how can i make it user friendly? using xsl? thou then i need to turn my copies to do those xsl stuffs. or is there things like php file outputting valid xml(i got this info from another forum)? and does it work in that way?

07-16-2007, 09:22 AM	#23 (permalink)
alex-party Elite Googler Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,085 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	"isnt it true that many sites use php sitemap instead of xml? so, if search engines donot support the format, it means they will not follow the sitemap(in php) too. right?" There are 2 types of sitemaps. 1 - is what you show to your visitors (html or php). 2 - is what you show to sers (always xml). You are trying to combine both into one as I understand in a very strange way. There is a simple way, create: 1. a php XML parser that would read nr.2 xml file and convert it into user friendly look (html) or use xslt if you want. 2. keep xml for sers always in xml. I can not see another way around for your idea.

07-17-2007, 07:26 AM	#25 (permalink)
sheena Google Freak Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 340 Thanks: 0 Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts	stuffing keywords in title tag is an unethical way of SEO technique.

07-17-2007, 11:15 PM	#28 (permalink)
tenzin Senior Googler Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 130 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	how come ur image with 8kb supported by this forum? mine with slightly more than 2 kb was not supported.

07-18-2007, 02:06 AM	#30 (permalink)
alex-party Elite Googler Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Ireland Posts: 1,085 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Relative links can make Search Bots go into INFINITE LOOP. I created a search bot simulator and tried it on relative links, so basically what I got is something like this: homepage/index/../../../../../.................... and script died after that You can't start a thread? Strange, maybe ask admins what the heck.... Also, ask about logo, I have no idea, I'm not a mod here Luck

GoogleCommunity Sponsor
Use coupon "forum" for 50% Off!


Sponsored Links