<META http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cach

Sopit · 07-28-2005, 07:36 PM

<META http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache">

I wonder if this tag will be banned from Google.

Please tell me.

markkk · 07-30-2005, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sopit

<META http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache">

I wonder if this tag will be banned from Google.

Please tell me.

Ban?? NO

JoeySEO · 10-10-2006, 01:30 AM

If your content doesn't change often you could avoid this tag and save your server from the wear and tear. No cache just tells the browser not to use cached pages and therefore it must call the web server for the page again - regardless of whether it viewed it 2 days ago or 2 minutes ago. If the page hasn't changed why would you want to? Let the user's computer do the work.

SEOforGoogle · 10-18-2006, 06:20 AM

I use this to make sure Google gets the latest updated version of the page - and if your site changes frequently, it's well worth it. The other side of it is that it forces Google to crawl your page - and since it knows there is a page in existance, but it doesn't remember what it's about, it tends to crawl more frequently img src="/richedit/smileys/9.gif" border="0"

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Is Gamail acount ending with "@gmail.com" or"	wanliju	Gmail Forum	14	10-07-2005 04:51 AM
<meta name="robots" content="ALL">	Sopit	Search Engine Optimization Forum	9	09-19-2005 01:52 PM
adwords "content" search	kidnthehall	Google AdWords & AdSense Forum	0	05-03-2005 12:17 PM
Managing "content targeting" budgets	orkjr	Google AdWords & AdSense Forum	2	02-27-2005 07:29 PM
'links:http://yoururl.com" vs "links:(space)http:/	skagwaypilot	Search Engine Optimization Forum	4	01-01-1970 01:50 PM

07-28-2005, 07:36 PM	#1 (permalink)
Sopit Junior Googler Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 28 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	<META http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache"> I wonder if this tag will be banned from Google. Please tell me.

10-10-2006, 01:30 AM	#3 (permalink)
JoeySEO Noogle Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 24 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	If your content doesn't change often you could avoid this tag and save your server from the wear and tear. No cache just tells the browser not to use cached pages and therefore it must call the web server for the page again - regardless of whether it viewed it 2 days ago or 2 minutes ago. If the page hasn't changed why would you want to? Let the user's computer do the work.

10-18-2006, 06:20 AM	#4 (permalink)
SEOforGoogle Senior Googler Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 153 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	I use this to make sure Google gets the latest updated version of the page - and if your site changes frequently, it's well worth it. The other side of it is that it forces Google to crawl your page - and since it knows there is a page in existance, but it doesn't remember what it's about, it tends to crawl more frequently img src="/richedit/smileys/9.gif" border="0"

GoogleCommunity Sponsor


Sponsored Links