PLEASE REVIEW MY NEW SITE

[luckymurari]

Please Review my new site....It's still under construction but much is going onbrbrLUCKY MURARI'S SITEbr

[anylund]

Not really much to comment about, but...brbr+ Peaceful colors (doesnt hurt the eye)br- 'Lucky Murari' looks little... umm... 'not very good' try not to create separate rectangles with differing from the background, it creates 'jigsaw puzzle' effect this includes the link texts too. They are now highlighted with lighter color... maybe using bolder text, perhaps.brbrYour comments section is going to change to more unite appearance with the rest of the site?brbrWeb desing is pretty much a matter of opinion and its your website, so you shouldn't care too much about what other people are saying...br

[cho_joong]

I'm waiting for more content.

[yudhis97]

its too simpel...

[speedyturtle]

I think you should put some more stuff there

[iJeff]

Since the page is lacking content, it's difficult to criticize but as to what is there so far...

The "Lucky Murari" image at the top sticks out like a sore thumb, the flaming font design belongs back in the 90s and is obviously script-generated. The general page-front seems to lack a lateral composure, possibly due to the lack of content.

Venturing further into the site, your lack of journalism experience (don't worry, I don't have any either) becomes apparent with the improper and excessive use of "...." as seen in

For all those Gtalk fans....this portion of my site is dedicated to it...Many of you may not know about many special features of Gtalk.....you can know them from here..........just explore!!

Another little error would be in your spacing.. commas do not trail spaces, a space comes after a comma.

Colours on the "GTALKTIPS" page do not conform with the rest of the page.. page labels are improper, inconsistent formatting, etc.

Amateur page, but if it's your first.. just keep working at it
(reminds me of the geocities days)

[sheepcentral]

TBH it lacks much original content (even if you created it, I'm sure that most of it could be found near verbatim somewhere else on the internet). The layout looks like a stock layout (as in a generic Google Pages one). Overall it's a bit naff. Spend some time learning HTML (and associated technologies) and then make a website that lacks resemblance to any other that I would be likely to come across. Don't be discouraged by this harsh criticism, I just don't think you've gone about it in the best manner.