| |
harrowcactus
Noogle
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
GC$
Items
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:41 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
What a fantastic idea, I think all forums should
have this on it as it makes the whole forum experience enjoyable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deepshikha
Noogle
Joined: 04 Apr 2006
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well I think this can be made a little more innovative I did not see a place of ideas and new innovations. Can anyone tell me how this can be triggered as I plenty of ideas and would like Google community to implement them if they find it feasable |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jeena71
Noogle
Joined: 07 Jul 2006
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| good idea,but more details on this GC$ may help the members in terms of how they get all these points |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
siongyin85
Junior Googler
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jessica wrote: | | i think this just creates too much pointless posts like yes, no, nice , etc... and destroys the purpose of the forum |
I'm sure GC has some method to prevent pointless comments/posts as you mentioned. Speaking of which, what difference is ur above comment different from the "pointless posts like yes, no, nice, etc"?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
siongyin85
Junior Googler
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jeena71 wrote: | | good idea,but more details on this GC$ may help the members in terms of how they get all these points |
Totally agree with jeena71 - i tink it should be measured upon:
- Relevance to the topic
- "Intelligence" to the topic - it can be how accurate the information provided is, etc
- "Timing of response" - how fast the user responds when it is required of him/her
I'm sure there are other criteria which we can measure against. But these are just the 3 which pop out of my head
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9
Google God
Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| siongyin85 wrote: | i tink it should be measured upon:
<ol><li>Relevance to the topic</li><li>"Intelligence" to the topic - it can be how accurate the information provided is, etc</li><li>"Timing of response" - how fast the user responds when it is required of him/her</li></ol>I'm sure there are other criteria which we can measure against. But these are just the 3 which pop out of my head
|
How should a computer measure the relevance of a post to the topic? By searching for specific keywords? That wouldn't be too good, since relevant posts might still have not much in common with the topic subject and original post.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
siongyin85
Junior Googler
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
hm, relevance in the sense that the person who makes a response actually answers the questions, or make a comment that is actually relevant or useful. Although this cannot be done automatically YET, but i guess users can provide feedback - i guess the GC$ function is doing it, but i guess the measurement or earning of GC$ is still not accurate enough.
just an opinion. wat do other people think? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IamTheKing9
Google God
Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Location: Mumbai, India
GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Still, if someone does spam for GC$, an alert member can always spot the post and report it to an administrator or moderator.
That isn't too hard.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
| Posted: 10 Oct 2008 4:28 pm Post subject: Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Host your free forums with Invision Plus.net forum web hosting with your own subdomain.
alexisBlue v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Icons in Part By: Travis Carden |
|
|
|
|
