Google Community Chat
 
Computer chips for “open-spectrum” devices are a closed book

You're visiting Google Community as a guest.
In order to post, you'll need to register and log in.


(If you were registered and logged in, these advertisements wouldn't be here)
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // General Discussion
   
Author Message
intelliot
Site Admin


Joined: 01 May 2004

18653.45 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:22 pm    Post subject: Computer chips for “open-spectrum” devices are a closed book Reply with quote
Quote:
TELECOMMUNICATIONS used to be a closed game, from the copper and fibre that carried the messages, to the phones themselves. Now, openness reigns in the world of wires. Networks must interconnect with those of competitors, and users can plug in their own devices as they will. One result of this openness has been a lot of innovation.

Openness is coming to the wireless world, too. Cheap and powerful devices that use unlicensed and lightly regulated parts of the radio spectrum are proliferating. But there is a problem. Though the spectrum is open, the microprocessor chips that drive the devices which use it are not. The interface information—the technical data needed to write software that would allow those chips to be used in novel ways—is normally kept secret by manufacturers. The result could be a lot less innovation in the open wireless world than in the open wired one.

Take, for example, the Champaign-Urbana Community Wireless Network (CUWiN), in Illinois. This group is trying to create a so-called meshed Wi-Fi network. Wi-Fi is a wireless technology that allows broadband internet communication over a range of about 50 metres. That range could, however, be extended if the devices in an area were configured to act as “platforms” that both receive and transmit signals. Messages would then hop from one platform to another until they got to their destination. That would allow such things as neighbourhood mobile-phone companies and a plethora of radio and TV stations, and all for almost no cost. But to make such goodies work, CUWiN needs to tweak the underlying capabilities of Wi-Fi chips in special ways.

When its engineers requested the interface information from the firms that furnish the chips, however, they were often rebuffed. A few companies with low-end, older technology supplied it. But Broadcom and Atheros, the two producers of the sophisticated chips that CUWiN needs if its system is to sing properly, refused. Nor is CUWiN alone in its enforced ignorance. SeattleWireless and NYCwireless, among other groups, have similar ideas, but are similarly stymied. Christian Sandvig of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who has been studying the brouhaha, believes regulators ought to enforce more openness.

Broadcom and Atheros say that making the interface information public would be illegal, because it could allow users to change the parameters of a chip in ways that violate the rules for using unlicensed spectrum (for example, by increasing its power or changing its operating frequency). That is a worry, but it depends on rather a conservative interpretation of the law. The current rules apply to so-called “software-defined radios” (where the ability to send and receive signals is modifiable on the chip), and do not apply directly to Wi-Fi. Also, by supplying the data, manufacturers would not be held liable if a user chose to tweak the chip in unlawful ways. And in any case, if the firms are really worried, they could release most of the interface, keeping back those features that are legally sensitive.

Nor is the interface information commercially sensitive. Engineers are not asking for the computer code that drives the interfaces, merely for the means to talk to them. And having the interface information in the public domain should eventually result in more chips being sold. So it is hard to see what the problem is beyond a dog-in-the-mangerish desire not to give anything away. Time to open it up, boys.


I love Wi-Fi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
darrenstraight
Site Admin & Platinum Member
Site Admin & Platinum Member


Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Location: England
173385.09 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I'm getting wireless broadband soon.
So this was an intresting article to read.

Thanks.
_________________
My Blog | Microsoft Discussion
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stuff2Do
Elite Googler
Elite Googler


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Location: England, UK
790.60 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
i got wireless, hehe, its easy to setup and easy to use, mostly plug n play
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Sponsored Links
Posted: 5 Dec 2008 9:26 am    Post subject: Advertisements
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // General Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Host your free forums with Invision Plus.net forum web hosting with your own subdomain.

alexisBlue v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Icons in Part By: Travis Carden

© 2005-2006 Google Community

Powered by phpBB

Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Powered by Google Search blog

This website is not affiliated in any way with Google, Inc.
Google™ is a registered trademark of Google, Inc.