| |
intelliot
Site Admin
Joined: 01 May 2004
18653.45 GC$
Items
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 05, 2004 10:13 pm Post subject: Firefox trumps Internet Explorer, says Microsoft's e-mag |
 |
|
|
from Slate, MSN's online magazine.
| Quote: | Are the Browser Wars Back?
How Mozilla's Firefox trumps Internet Explorer.
By Paul Boutin
Posted Wednesday, June 30, 2004, at 11:03 AM PT
I usually don't worry about PC viruses, but last week's Scob attack snapped me awake. The clever multi-stage assault, carried out by alleged Russian spam crime lords, infiltrated corporate Web servers and then used them to infect home computers. The software that Scob (also known as Download.ject) attempted to install on its victims' machines included a keystroke logger.
In less than a day, Internet administrators sterilized the infection by shutting down the Russian server that hosted the spyware. But not before a barrage of scary reports had circled the world. "Users are being told to avoid using Internet Explorer until Microsoft patches a serious security hole," the BBC warned. (Disclosure: Microsoft owns Slate.) CNET reporter Robert Lemos zeroed in on why the attack was so scary. "This time," he wrote, "the flaws affect every user of Internet Explorer." That's about 95 percent of all Net users. No matter how well they had protected themselves against viruses, spyware, and everything else in the past, they were still vulnerable to yet another flaw in Microsoft's browser.
Scob didn't get me, but it was enough to make me ditch Explorer in favor of the much less vulnerable Firefox browser. Firefox is built and distributed free by the Mozilla Organization, a small nonprofit corporation spun off last year from the fast-fading remnants of Netscape, which was absorbed by AOL in 1999. Firefox development and testing are mostly done by about a dozen Mozilla employees, plus a few dozen others at companies like IBM, Sun, and Red Hat. I've been using it for a week now, and I've all but forgotten about Explorer.
You've probably been told to dump Internet Explorer for a Mozilla browser before, by the same propeller-head geek who wants you to delete Windows from your hard drive and install Linux. You've ignored him, and good for you. Microsoft wiped out Netscape in the Browser Wars of the late 1990s not only because the company's management pushed the bounds of business ethics, but also because its engineers built a better browser. When Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale approved the Mozilla project—an open-source browser based on Netscape's code—in 1998, it seemed like a futile act of desperation.
But six years later, the surviving members of the Mozilla insurgency are staging a comeback. The latest version of Firefox, released this Monday, has a more professional look, online help, and a tool that automatically imports your bookmarks, history, site passwords, and other settings from Explorer. Meanwhile, all-conquering Internet Explorer has been stuck in the mud for the past year, as Microsoft stopped delivering new versions. The company now rolls out only an occasional fix as part of its Windows updates. Gates and company won the browser war, so why keep fighting it?
The problem is that hackers continue to find and exploit security holes in Explorer. Many of them take advantage of Explorer's ActiveX system, which lets Web sites download and install software onto visitors' computers, sometimes without users' knowledge. ActiveX was meant to make it easy to add the latest interactive multimedia and other features to sites, but instead it's become a tool for sneaking spyware onto unsuspecting PCs. That's why the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, a partnership between the tech industry and Homeland Security, recently took the unusual step of advising people to consider switching browsers. Whether or not you do, US-CERT advises increasing your Internet Explorer security settings, per Microsoft's instructions. (Alas, the higher setting disables parts of Slate's interface.) Even if you stop using Explorer, other programs on your computer may still automatically launch it to connect to sites.
Firefox eschews ActiveX and other well-known infection paths. You can configure it to automatically download most files when you click on them, but not .exe files, which are runnable programs. I thought this was a bug before I realized Firefox was saving me from myself, since .exe files could be viruses or stealth installers.
For actual Web surfing, Firefox's interface is familiar enough to Explorer users. There's hardly anything to say about it, which is a compliment. Some interactive features designed exclusively for Internet Explorer won't appear, such as the pop-up menus on Slate's table of contents. A few sites don't display properly, but they're pretty rare. More common are those that stupidly turn non-Explorer browsers away by claiming they're "unsupported." Trusty, useful ActiveX-powered sites such as Windows Update don't load at all, but that's the idea. You can always launch Internet Explorer for those when you need to.
Firefox also adds a productivity feature that Explorer has never gotten around to: tabbed browsing. You can open several Web pages in the same window and flip through them as tabs, similar to those used in some of Windows' dialog boxes. It's tough to understand why tabbed browsing is such an improvement until you've tried it. But if you're in the habit of opening a barrage of news and blog links every morning and then reading them afterward, or clicking on several Google results from the same search, tabbed browsing is an order of magnitude more efficient and organized than popping up a whole new window for each link.
That said, be aware that getting started with Firefox isn't a one-click operation. After installing the browser, you'll need to reinstall plug-ins for some programs, as well as Sun's Java engine for any Java-powered pages. Let me save you an hour of head-scratching here: Save Sun's Java installation file to your desktop, then go back to Firefox's menus and select File -> Open File to install the downloaded .xpi file into the browser. That'll work where other methods fail without explanation.
Once you're set up, it still takes a day or two to get used to the interface and feature differences between Explorer and Firefox, as well as the fact that your favorite sites may look a little different. That's why I left it out of Slate's 20-minute anti-virus plan. But if you've got time to make the switch, the peace of mind is worth it. Mozilla also makes a free e-mail program called Thunderbird and a calendar tool called Sunbird, if you want to avoid using Outlook and Outlook Express, two other virus carriers. They're nowhere near as feature-packed as Outlook, but the e-mail client includes a spam filter that works pretty well after you train it on four or five thousand messages—in my case, one week's mail.
Will Firefox make your computer hackproof? Even Mozilla's spokespeople stress that no software can be guaranteed to be safe, and that Firefox's XPInstall system could conceivably be tricked into installing a keystroke logger instead of Sun's Java engine. But for now, there's safety in numbers—the lack of them, that is. Internet Explorer is used by 95 percent of the world. Firefox's fan base adds up to 2 or 3 percent at most. Which browser do you think the Russian hackers are busily trying to break into again?
Paul Boutin is a Silicon Valley writer who spent 15 years as a software engineer and manager.
Photograph of Godzilla on Slate's home page by Kazuhiro Nogi/AFP. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metalblade1335
Senior Googler
Joined: 25 Jun 2004
202.85 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| haha ie sucks yes that is some great news |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
picknslap
Googler
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
1924.21 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: Firefox trumps Internet Explorer, says Microsoft's e-mag |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | That said, be aware that getting started with Firefox isn't a one-click operation. After installing the browser, you'll need to reinstall plug-ins for some programs, as well as Sun's Java engine for any Java-powered pages. |
That's my only gripe with Firefox, or any Mozilla browser; the lack of integrated plugins. When I started using it it bugged me off how I had to install every plugin each time I wanted to view something. I guess it's not that bad considering is free software!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tntcheats
So sexy it hurts
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: Cananada
13184.52 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's fantastic: this patch that's distrobuted doesn't even PATCH the security hole!
_________________
Tetris | Great Big Blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
totherescue
Googler
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
4942.88 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I believe I have posted on this topic before...  I don't know where that thread went though. Well anyway, I'll restate the gist of my previous post on this topic  ...Mozilla Firefox has gotten so good that even Slate, Microsoft's own online magazine, tells people they should download Mozilla Firefox instead of their own Microsoft Internet Explorer. Of course, they are right, but it is surprising that Microsoft would admit to such a thing like that. Firefox is undoubtedly superior to Internet Explorer in many ways, but still has a long way to go. If you haven't already, go to Mozilla and download Firefox immediately! You won't regret it, I guarantee it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tntcheats
So sexy it hurts
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: Cananada
13184.52 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can't wait till they release 1.0 That will be the day.
Of course, they'll only do that when Firefox is perfect which probably means that they'll end up having 0.9.9.9.9.9--it's very hard to make something perfect.
_________________
Tetris | Great Big Blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cvrk3
Google Guru
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: India
16443.40 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2004 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i am using mozilla now. let me download firefox and shall comeback. i hear from you people that it is graat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cvrk3
Google Guru
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: India
16443.40 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I have downloaded and installed firefox. it is very fast. thanks to everyone for the suggestion. I remembered to have read in this forum that there is a provision to check your gmails directly from this brower. (instead of getting gtray.) can the author repost how i can get the messages in the browser itself when there is a mail? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tntcheats
So sexy it hurts
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: Cananada
13184.52 GC$
Items
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cvrk3
Google Guru
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: India
16443.40 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2004 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
hi tntcheats,
thanks a lot and i am going to the link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SgtHulka
Noogle
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
111.96 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:57 am Post subject: Firefox rules |
|
|
|
| I've been using Firefox for about a year or so, and can't stand when I need to go back to IE to visit some site that requires it. Sites need to be more browser-friendly. Love the tabs, the extensions, and of course, the Google Bar! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seaneh
Googler
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Location: Yorkshire, England
1747.68 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I think Microsoft would be a bit daft if they didn't say, listen guys, go to a different browser. Ours is full of holes. Save them time updating it when all there really going to be is concentrating on version 7 to come out with Longhorn, as I know I've read will happen elsewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LokiSnake
Noogle
Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Location: Somewhere, Someplace
579.28 GC$
Items
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I use Firefox on my mac, and it is pretty good on it too. Nice and fast. It uses less memory than Safari, OS X Panther's built-in browser. Yeah, and I don't like how there are sites that only work with IE. Why can't people just comply to the standards?
P.S. I heard that Longhorn might be delayed to 2009 or something, unless they cut out some features, it won't make it to it's original intended due date. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
| Posted: 5 Dec 2008 10:43 am Post subject: Advertisements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Host your free forums with Invision Plus.net forum web hosting with your own subdomain.
alexisBlue v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Icons in Part By: Travis Carden |
|
|
|
|
