Google Community Chat
 
Bush Presses Congress to Renew Patriot Act

You're visiting Google Community as a guest.
In order to post, you'll need to register and log in.



(If you were registered and logged in, these advertisements wouldn't be here)
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // General Discussion
   
Author Message
Randy
Former Moderator
Former Moderator


Joined: 17 Jun 2004

18197.20 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:52 pm    Post subject: Bush Presses Congress to Renew Patriot Act Reply with quote
Bush Presses Congress to Renew Patriot Act, Bush Says Patriot Act Makes America Safer
Quote:
COLUMBUS, Ohio - President Bush, facing efforts by some in his own party to scale back the post-Sept. 11 Patriot Act, says it has made America safer and should be made permanent.

"The Patriot Act closed dangerous gaps in America's law enforcement and intelligence capabilities, gaps the terrorists exploited when they attacked us on September the 11th," Bush said.

Lawmakers responded to the 2001 attacks by overwhelmingly approving the law 45 days later. It allowed expanded surveillance of terror suspects, increased use of material witness warrants to hold suspects incommunicado and permitted secret proceedings in immigration cases.

Now, more than a dozen provisions are set to expire. Those provisions, among other things, provide authority for nationwide search warrants, enable the
FBI and intelligence agencies to share information about terrorism cases and gave the FBI the power to obtain records in terrorism-related cases from entities such as libraries.

During Bush' 2004 re-election campaign, he made preserving the law a common refrain, but he has rarely spoken of it since. His renewed focus came as Congress has begun working on the act's renewal amid fresh criticisms — from members of both parties — that it undermines basic freedoms.

Bush pressured Congress to make the expiring provisions permanent. His administration also is seeking greater powers for the FBI to subpoena records in terrorism investigations without the approval of a judge or grand jury.

"My message to Congress is clear: Terrorist threats against us will not expire at the end of the year and neither should the protections of the Patriot Act," Bush told more than 100 law enforcement officers.

The president credited the law with helping to bring federal charges against more than 400 suspects — more than half of whom have been convicted — and to break up terror cells in New York, Oregon, Virginia and Florida.

He spoke at the Ohio Patrol Training Academy to highlight the case of a Columbus man, Iyman Faris, who was accused of plotting attacks on a New York bridge and a Midwest shopping mall but was tracked down with the help of the Patriot Act.

Bush said Faris met
Osama bin Laden in 2000 at an al-Qaida training camp in
Afghanistan. Later, he received instructions from top terror leader Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to destroy the Brooklyn Bridge. Now, because of the Patriot Act, Bush said, Faris has provided information about al-Qaida and is serving a 20-year prison sentence.

On Tuesday, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved revisions to the law that would give the FBI the expanded administrative subpoena powers the Bush administration has been seeking.

But much of the debate in Congress so far has focused on possible limits to the law.

Sens. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and di-- Durbin, D-Ill., want to tighten standards for the law's so-called "sneak and peek" warrants issued without immediate notification of the target and for "roving" wiretaps, and to exempt libraries from provisions that allow FBI expanded access to records.

The administration has warned that the Craig-Durbin bill would draw a Bush veto. The president did not repeat that threat, but he singled out the roving wiretap as an "especially important" tool that has been used successfully for years against drug dealers and others.

Bush also sought to defend the law by citing Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., who said she has looked into the administration's use of the Patriot Act and found no abuses.

"Remember that the next time you hear someone make an unfair criticism of this important, good law," Bush said.

Lisa Graves, the ACLU's senior counsel for legislative strategy, said the lack of a documented case of abuse doesn't mean the law doesn't violate civil liberties. She said the
Justice Department's inspector general reported that 7,000 people have complained of abuse and countless others don't even know they've been subjected to a search because the law requires that they be kept secret.

The ACLU wants the government to show evidence of a connection to terrorist activity before being allowed to search records.

Yahoo! News: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/20050609/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Eric
Better than you
Google Guru


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2491.35 GC$

Items

PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Bush and Cheney sitting in a tree...
_________________
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get it's pants on." - Winston Churchill
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Sponsored Links
Posted: 5 Dec 2008 10:39 am    Post subject: Advertisements
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Google Community Forum Index // General Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Host your free forums with Invision Plus.net forum web hosting with your own subdomain.

alexisBlue v1.2 // Theme Created By: Andrew Charron // Icons in Part By: Travis Carden

© 2005-2006 Google Community

Powered by phpBB

Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Powered by Google Search blog

This website is not affiliated in any way with Google, Inc.
Google™ is a registered trademark of Google, Inc.